What Others Are Saying About The Recent Minnesota Game-Cam Photo...
The events surrounding the elusive homin we call bigfoot have been rather numerous over the last two weeks(numerous in that this should be considered somewhat of an influx of reports of this nature). We've had a number of sightings near San Antonio, Texas, a game cam photo from Kentucky, one in the infamous Happy Valley Circle area of Georgia and one in the great state of Minnesota. The last of which brings me to writing this article. After reviewing the Minnesota game-cam photos; I have come to the conclusion that these are faked. Why? Because I have personally seen bigfoot-type peoples and this is not the way of their appearance in both movement or stature.
Additionally, any bigfoot researcher will tell you that it is virtually impossible to capture such an event on a game camera. Not impossible; just "unlikely". For instance, the Kentucky photo that surfaced a few months back was most likely of a bigfoot type being. Why? Because it actually had a face and was comparative to known bigfoot statures. The method by which it was obtained seemed sound. But there again, was it real? We'll never know. A great many people have commented on the Minnesota Game-Cam Photo.
Let's see what some of them have to say:
"I am the chief investigator of Georgia Bigfoot Research And Investigations™ and have been in the field for over 20 years, but even a rookie can tell that is not a creature but someone in a suit. Look at the legs they look just like the way a pair of pants would fit over someone's legs, then look at the distance of the stride?. If it was a creature, the distance would be further apart. This looks like the stride of a normal man. As for the prints... well I have poured hundreds of pounds of plaster and I have never pulled anything that looks like this- so for my opinion, this is yet again another hoax." - Jack Jackson, Georgia Bigfoot And Investigation™
"If this is not a fake, it is an OUTSTANDING bf picture". - Terry Trainor, The United Bigfoot Research Group™
"Fake. The suit is akin to what was used in the "Rick-Matt Hoax" in Georgia. The being pictured is not anatomically correct either. Nor do the feet plasters suggest with their size that they came from the individual in the photo. These photos are very similar to something you'd see posted by BUTCHYKID on youtube.com" - Jeffrey Teagle (President-Owner), The Chattahoochee Bigfoot Organization™
"I believe this photograph to be a hoax. It looks like an ill fitting Halloween costume. The body to too skinny and not bulky like real Bigfoot creatures. There's not any muscle tone at all. The stride is not long enough either. Like I said earlier, I believe this to be fake." - Shane Honea (Field Investigator), The Chattahoochee Bigfoot Organization™
Everybody seems to believe that the Minnesota picture was a shot of someone in some kind of hairy suit. According to measurements of the little tree in front of him, he would have had to be about 7 feet tall. I don't think it was a man. It was in actual fact a photoshopped image. Go to http://www.hairygiants.com/ and all will be explained. - William Mayes, Bigfoot Researcher
Well, there you have it. If you'd like your comment added to the list then let us know.
Additionally, any bigfoot researcher will tell you that it is virtually impossible to capture such an event on a game camera. Not impossible; just "unlikely". For instance, the Kentucky photo that surfaced a few months back was most likely of a bigfoot type being. Why? Because it actually had a face and was comparative to known bigfoot statures. The method by which it was obtained seemed sound. But there again, was it real? We'll never know. A great many people have commented on the Minnesota Game-Cam Photo.
Let's see what some of them have to say:
"I am the chief investigator of Georgia Bigfoot Research And Investigations™ and have been in the field for over 20 years, but even a rookie can tell that is not a creature but someone in a suit. Look at the legs they look just like the way a pair of pants would fit over someone's legs, then look at the distance of the stride?. If it was a creature, the distance would be further apart. This looks like the stride of a normal man. As for the prints... well I have poured hundreds of pounds of plaster and I have never pulled anything that looks like this- so for my opinion, this is yet again another hoax." - Jack Jackson, Georgia Bigfoot And Investigation™
"If this is not a fake, it is an OUTSTANDING bf picture". - Terry Trainor, The United Bigfoot Research Group™
"Fake. The suit is akin to what was used in the "Rick-Matt Hoax" in Georgia. The being pictured is not anatomically correct either. Nor do the feet plasters suggest with their size that they came from the individual in the photo. These photos are very similar to something you'd see posted by BUTCHYKID on youtube.com" - Jeffrey Teagle (President-Owner), The Chattahoochee Bigfoot Organization™
"I believe this photograph to be a hoax. It looks like an ill fitting Halloween costume. The body to too skinny and not bulky like real Bigfoot creatures. There's not any muscle tone at all. The stride is not long enough either. Like I said earlier, I believe this to be fake." - Shane Honea (Field Investigator), The Chattahoochee Bigfoot Organization™
Everybody seems to believe that the Minnesota picture was a shot of someone in some kind of hairy suit. According to measurements of the little tree in front of him, he would have had to be about 7 feet tall. I don't think it was a man. It was in actual fact a photoshopped image. Go to http://www.hairygiants.com/ and all will be explained. - William Mayes, Bigfoot Researcher
Well, there you have it. If you'd like your comment added to the list then let us know.






Do you think we'll ever find actual proof of Bigfoot, or whatever people choose to call the creature, or do you think they are too clever to be caught?
Reply to this
Everybody seems to believe that the Minnesota picture was a shot of someone in some kind of hairy suit. According to measurements of the little tree in front of him, he would have had to be about 7 feet tall. I don't think it was a man. It was in actual fact a photoshopped image. Go to http://www.hairygiants.com and all will be explained.
Reply to this