Over the past week I have seen numerous posts concerning whether or not if the bigfoot peoples have a language. Fortunately for me as well as many others; I have actually heard them speak. My recollections were that of a garbled jibberish between one or more of the beings. I have come to refer this form of communication as "Samurai Jibberish". The reason being is because to me, it sounds as if one is listening to two Asiatic peoples communicating. Very fast and uninterpretable.

One can only imagine where their language skills originated. Perhaps initially, they had their own set of vocabulary that was later enhanced or added upon by human interaction. As a citizen of the United States (The Great Melting Pot), we find that our English language mainly originated in Europe from the Latin Antiqua (or the "Old Latin"; some 70% of it). However, over the decades and centuries, we've adopted words (or verbiage) from other cultures that came to this land in search of a better life or financial gain whatever it may be. For example the word "taco" had no meaning in our culture. Another more familiar word that has been recently created is "mousepad". Which is not a place where mice live but something used in the aide of computer operation.

With the new arrivals to the Americas, one often wonders if trappers and frontiersman had personal interaction with these beings. If so, did the bigfoot selectively choose English, French or Spanish words given to certain objects or meanings and adopt them for their own just as we have done over the millenia?

If we were to teach gorilla to "sign (sign language)" which has been achieved I might add; and then later release it into the wild; what would happen? The first scenario that I can imagine is that either the gorilla would die from "not being able to adapt" OR "it would thrive".Given this scenario, if the gorilla survived, would it teach others what it learned? In otherwords, would we have a clan of wild gorillas that all knew how to use sign language?

Additionally, if the bigfoot people do know how to communicate via "vocal chords", then we can knowlonger classify this animinal as and "animal". Instead, we'd have to go back, retract and consider the possibilities that we are dealing with "humanoids". Or "hominids" as suggested by Russian scientist and a handful of American researchers.

The question then arises that IF we are dealing with "primitive humans"; do they not and are they not subjected to the same rights as modern humans?